My roommate has been interviewed several times the past several days relating to his being abducted seven years ago by a then-17-year old, who a week later abducted and killed a 21-year old man. Leo Little, the then-17-year old, was sentenced to death at the trial, at which my roommate Malachi testified about his abduction. The Supreme Court decided 5-4 today that they are overturning the legality of sentencing minors to death, thus taking Leo off death row. It's been surreal for Mal the past couple of weeks and I'd ask your prayers for him as he's relived a lot of it. Getting woken up with a gun in your face can't be any kind of a pleasant memory; carting around someone for 2.5 hours who's told you his intent is to kill you has got to be so haunting.
I go back and forth on the issue of the death penalty. I believe in justice and I believe God's covenant with Noah after the flood was one with mankind, which included a life for a life. I believe it's a deterrent. I also believe in transformation, in grace, in forgiveness -- which cause me to rethink things like the death penalty. All these things I believe I know God not only believes but demonstrates in unfathomable ways. But I struggle with finding the balance and what to think about ending a life, which is a great struggle, I think, because these types of things don't deserve easy answers or neat, packaged answers. I think they are things we need to wrestle with constantly; I have trouble with answers being stated flippantly or so adamantly as right.
And with this case, I know Mal is struggling with what to think. Here's a guy who could have easily murdered him, but for some reason didn't. A guy who did eventually kill, who knew what he was doing when he did so, who murdered deliberately and without remorse. A "good" example of the need for the death penalty. But I don't know if I could be the one to say, "Kill him." I don't know if I could be one to participate (jury-wise) in recommending death. I don't know.
I think about the death penalty and began to relate it to war and genocide and get even more confused. After watching
Hotel Rwanda, an outstanding, compassion-causing film all Christians need to see, I begin to rethink my thoughts about war. It broke my heart to see the troops pull out of Rwanda in the movie. It broke my heart to glimpse the destruction, brokenness, and evil that was carried out in larger doses after peace forces left. I couldn't stand that the U.N. soldiers were not allowed to fire their weapons, even if they were protecting innocent lives from being taken away.
So is there a place for that type of killing, when one group is killing out of hate, spite, whatever, as was seen in Rwanda? Is there a place for "just war" to be made and carried out? What would I have liked to have happened in Rwanda: that murder would not have taken place. How could that have been kept from happenning? Most likely, realisticly, those doing the murdering would've had to have been killed, taken out by force. Which makes me an advocate of just war in that case, right?
Wow, I don't know. I don't know what to think of it all. With the Rwanda situation, not only did the mass murders hurt, it was the lack of concern to do
anything by the rest of the world, or to be informed of it, especially by Christians. But the murders do bother me. And I can't say for sure What Would Jesus (have) Do(ne). I'm wrestling with that; and in doing so, I'm experiencing compassion and care for people on both sides, those doing the harm and those being harmed. I'm hurting for the instigators and those hurt by them. I'm mad at Satan and his cronies for the harm and evil they are causing. And maybe that's what should be happening: compassion for people and being ticked off at the devil.
So as an ambassador for Jesus, who took the brunt of so much violence and hate, how do I respond in my world?
Thoughts?